Do folks honestly choose to NOT remember the man who boasted of being able to grab p***y of anyone he wanted because he is a "celebrity" ? What if he were bragging about having been able to do this to your mother, wife, sister, daughter, or friends? So many things can be put under his paranoid egocentric narcissism; frankly, making Richard Nixon's own paranoia look almost palatable and acceptable. Why are the utterings of the latter mentioned individual not being broadcast like seeds on fertile soil?
Do we really want someone occupying the oval office who uses Christ as a marketing ploy and the faith and fears of millions as his be all end all road to earthly glory? George Washington who decried anything related to being named King... would be appalled and he had his own set of historical problems and issues.
There is so much to abhor here, but we cannot vote on fear. We must hold steadfast to the tenets of our American ideals, aspirations, and liberty. Do you really want someone to deny liberty to others while we bask in it's glory? Don forget that things of this nature love karma and karma loves it; this is a dish will be served bitterly cold and wholly indigestible.
I am a registered independent. I am not a party platform person; I am a human being who looks for the humanity in others, before I cast my vote. I look at their history of outreach towards others, the cura personalis, so to speak (Jesuit leaning, here). If I don't see it by example and history ... my check mark by their name is forever lost.
Politics is a dirty business; it used to be a worthy avocation (never meant to be a profession). But even this, boasting of being able to physically assault anyone he chooses, is well beyond dirty or at the very least totally redefines 'dirty'.
Let's Have a Dialog
No comments:
Post a Comment